President Obama Stretches Readmission Gains

By  | 
The medical literature is apparently not immune to promotions and marketing. Graphics can be powerful at a time when few read between the lines – or read the lines at all. The following graphic was prepared for the President by CMS.

  • Note the use of only 2 points of change from 17.5 to 19.5 to enhance the apparent effect.
  • The change from 19% readmissions to 18% across this 2 percentage point difference generations a much steeper slope. 

Truncated graph – from wiki  A truncated graph (also known as a torn graph) has a y axis that does not start at 0. These graphs can create the impression of important change where there is relatively little change.

    The other graphics presented by the President are more reasonable. For example the % uninsured has the full 0% to 25% represented graphically.

    The big question arising from the claim of improvement with readmissions penalties is whether the previous payment system resulted in worsening of readmissions and perhaps other quality measures. Perhaps the DRG design was the problem as seen in patients sent home at times too soon, as seen in in marginalization of nurses, and as seen in overstressed home and primary care situations. 

    Recent Posts and References 

    The MACRA Test – Can You Survive the P4P Discrimination?

    Selling and Swelling a Bigger HITECH Bubble

    Time to Burst the HITECH Bubble

    Six Degrees of Discrimination By Health Care Payment Design

    President Obama and Proven Health Reform Ideas

    JAMA has granted access to government officials for another publication. This time the author was President Obama. One portion of his publication stuck out. “We engaged with Congress to identify the combination of proven health reform ideas that could pass and have continued to adapt them since.”
    Geriatric Emergency Rooms Also a Mismatch with True Need 

    More Geriatricians Will Not Solve the Geriatric Care Crisis

    The Great Folly of Health Care Quality Studies

    Rallying One Hundred for Health Access Not MACRA

    The Ultimate Government Health Care Paradox – Government must facilitate better EHRs and better health access, not prevent them.

    Government Compromise of Trauma Response

    Domino Decline By Design – as ERs Close, Those Nearby Face Challenges, as Small or Rural Hospitals Close or Practices Where Needed…

    Prevent MACRA to Do No Harm
    Poor Payment Dictates Poor Training Outcomes in Primary Care
    No Positive Spin for the Innovator Tailspin – more claims for innovation successes are apparently attempts to hide failure
    Stop the Promotion To Restore Mental Health Access – claims of mental health care reforms or improvements are a stark contrast from the reality of lowest payment, highest complexity of care, unreliable payment, and poor support other than lots of rhetoric

    The Consequences of Innovation Procrastination – Distractions due to innovations result in harm to millions who need care delivery, but we have more rearrangements, confusion, reorganization, rapid change, and worse. It is time to stop exhausting possibilities and support those who do the work of front line health access.

    The Federal Cause of Shortage Areas and Access Barriers – The Federal Design for payment shapes the breadth, depth, and locations of shortage areas due to lowest payments for Medicaid and Medicare and other plan designs that pay least 

    Primary care can be recovered and should be recovered, 

    but cannot be recovered when moving the wrong directions

    Robert C. Bowman, M.D.

    The blogs represent the opinion of the blogger alone.

    Basic Health Access Web   Basic Health Access Blog   World of Rural Medical Education

    Source: New feed

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *